Category: America

  • Big Pharma’s New Endgame: Sidestepping FDA’s Stricter Drug Ad Rules

    The familiar setup plays out again: a woman stares into a mirror, her reflection tired and somber. Then, as she starts an antidepressant, her life magically transforms. Her corgi prances at her feet, and her family reunites joyfully—all while a voice rattles off chilling side effects: suicidal thoughts, strokes, or even death.

    Logan H. Merrill, writing for Freedom Magazine, highlights this practice in a recent investigation, calling out the nearly $40 billion psychiatric drug industry for its mastery of distraction. For years, Big Pharma has relied on these tactics to downplay the risks of their products. But new FDA rules, effective November 20, 2024, aim to change that.

    Cracking Down on Cuddly Distractions

    Big Pharma Drug Warnings Statistic

    As Merrill explains, the updated FDA rules require drug ads to present side effect warnings in a “clear, conspicuous, and neutral manner.” This nine-page guideline, more than a decade in the making, bans manipulative visuals and soothing audio designed to distract viewers.

    Merrill describes a recent Rexulti commercial as a prime example: while the voiceover warns of side effects like permanent muscle disorders, coma, or death, the screen fills with heartwarming scenes of corgis and family picnics. Such ads, Merrill writes, have historically flouted earlier FDA rules by disguising their warnings in happy imagery.

    But under the new guidelines, the days of glossing over grim realities with adorable pets and warm lighting may be numbered.

    Big Pharma’s Legal Gymnastics

    However, Merrill astutely notes that pharmaceutical companies are unlikely to roll over. Instead of compliance, they’re likely searching for ways to exploit loopholes. In Freedom Magazine, Merrill envisions a scenario in which corporate boards, faced with these new rules, quickly call in their legal teams to strategize a workaround.

    One glaring loophole, as Merrill outlines, lies in the rules’ limited scope: the regulations apply only to television and radio ads. They don’t touch social media, telehealth companies, or online influencers—channels that have become central to modern advertising.

    The Rise of Influencers and Telehealth

    Merrill warns that Big Pharma has already begun shifting its marketing efforts online, where the FDA’s oversight doesn’t reach. Social media influencers, in particular, are becoming key players in promoting psychiatric drugs. These influencers are often viewed as more relatable and trustworthy than traditional ads, which Merrill sees as a dangerous trend.

    Adding to the problem, telehealth companies are now partnering with drugmakers to promote medications under the radar. As Merrill writes, these platforms—free from the same advertising restrictions as the manufacturers—offer yet another avenue for Big Pharma to sidestep transparency.

    Congress Takes Aim at Loopholes

    In response to this growing concern, Merrill reports that Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Mike Braun (R-IN) have introduced the Protecting Patients from Deceptive Drug Ads Online Act. This bill aims to close the loopholes by holding not just drug manufacturers but also influencers and telehealth companies accountable.

    As Merrill explains, if the legislation passes, anyone promoting prescription drugs online would be required to disclose who is paying them. Such a move could force transparency across the board—a direct challenge to Big Pharma’s current practices.

    A Battle for Truth

    Throughout Freedom Magazine’s exposé, Merrill emphasizes the urgency of addressing these loopholes. While the FDA’s new rules mark a step toward accountability, they leave significant gaps that allow pharmaceutical companies to continue their manipulative tactics unchecked.

    Merrill’s reporting makes one thing clear: the battle for truth in drug advertising is far from over. As the industry pivots to the unregulated digital frontier, the stakes for consumer safety and transparency couldn’t be higher.

    Big Pharma, as Merrill deftly highlights, has built its empire on distraction. Whether it can be forced into genuine accountability remains to be seen.

  • Fethullah Gülen, Advocate for Peace and Dialogue, Passes Away at 86

    Fethullah Gülen, a prominent Turkish cleric and advocate for interfaith dialogue and education, passed away on October 21, 2024, in a Pennsylvania hospital at the age of 86. Known for his emphasis on peace, tolerance, and service to humanity, Gülen dedicated his life to fostering dialogue among religions and promoting moderate interpretations of Islam. His death brings to a close a remarkable chapter in both Turkish history and global Islamic thought.

    Gülen’s legacy is shaped by his efforts to encourage altruism, education, and interfaith understanding. He founded the Gülen movement, or “Hizmet” (meaning “service” in Turkish), which built a global network of schools, universities, and charitable organizations that promoted these values. The movement emphasized that education and ethical leadership are essential to a peaceful, just society. Gülen’s teachings resonated with millions, not only in Turkey but across the world, as his message reached diverse communities through the network of schools and initiatives.

    Despite his peaceful ideology, Gülen became a highly polarizing figure in Turkey. Once aligned with President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, their relationship soured in 2013, and Gülen was later accused of orchestrating the failed coup attempt of 2016, charges he denied until his death. This led to his movement being attacked by the Turkish government, and many of his followers faced heavy persecution, hunting and kidnappings. Turkish representatives have also interefere with political affairs of other countries demanding that followers of Hizmet would not deliver public peaceful statements at Parliaments and official places. However, Gülen remained a staunch proponent of non-violence, consistently advocating for dialogue and mutual respect to resolve differences.

    Throughout his life, Gülen was recognized for his commitment to peace, having received awards for his efforts in fostering harmony between different cultures and faiths. His outreach extended to institutions such as the Vatican and Jewish organizations, showcasing his dedication to bridging divides between communities often in conflict. His moderate stance on Islam, coupled with his focus on science, education, and civic responsibility, made him a revered figure among his followers.

    Gülen’s passing leaves behind a complex legacy, marked by both admiration for his peaceful contributions and the controversies that shadowed his later years. Nevertheless, he will be remembered by many as a spiritual leader who sought to create a more compassionate, educated, and harmonious world.

    A movement of Service

    The Gülen movement, also known as Hizmet (meaning “service” in Turkish), stands out as a global initiative that focuses on education, interfaith dialogue, and social service. At its core, the movement seeks to promote values of tolerance, peace, and cooperation across various cultures and religious communities. Founded by Fethullah Gülen, the movement expanded rapidly, particularly through the establishment of schools and educational institutions across Turkey and in over 100 countries worldwide.

    Focus on Education and Altruism

    One of the most positive aspects of the Gülen movement is its emphasis on education. Gülen viewed education as a means to transform society for the better, advocating for schools that integrate academic excellence with moral values. The schools affiliated with the movement, known for their focus on science, technology, and mathematics, have provided quality education to students from diverse backgrounds, regardless of nationality or religion. This educational initiative is driven by the belief that well-rounded, educated individuals contribute positively to the peace and progress of society.

    The movement’s schools not only focus on academic learning but also emphasize character building, with an ethical dimension that encourages students to become compassionate, socially responsible individuals. These schools often promote interfaith understanding and multiculturalism, making them influential in conflict-prone areas by fostering mutual respect and dialogue among different communities.

    Promoting Interfaith Dialogue

    A central pillar of Gülen’s teachings is his dedication to interfaith dialogue. He consistently encouraged open discussions between different religious traditions, including Islam, Christianity, and Judaism. Gülen himself initiated dialogue with global religious leaders, including the Vatican and Jewish organizations, with the aim of creating understanding and collaboration across religious divides. His efforts were particularly significant in a time when many regions of the world were grappling with religious conflict.

    This commitment to dialogue is reflected in various conferences and forums organized by the movement, where people from different faiths come together to discuss issues of common interest such as peace, justice, and mutual coexistence. Through these initiatives, the movement has helped to break down stereotypes and foster a spirit of cooperation, which has been praised by scholars and leaders worldwide.

    Social Services and Philanthropy

    Beyond education and dialogue, the Gülen movement has made significant contributions in the realm of social services. Various philanthropic activities supported by the movement include disaster relief, healthcare, and assistance to underprivileged communities. The movement’s charitable organizations, both in Turkey and globally, have been at the forefront of humanitarian efforts, helping those affected by natural disasters and economic hardships. Their work has ranged from providing scholarships to disadvantaged students to offering medical aid in countries facing crises.

    This altruistic element of the movement aligns with Gülen’s belief in serving humanity and addressing the practical needs of society through compassion and generosity. It has helped thousands of people improve their living conditions and access opportunities for personal development, which otherwise might not have been available to them.

    Advocacy for Peaceful Coexistence

    The Gülen movement is built on the idea that differences in religion, culture, and ideology should not be sources of conflict but rather opportunities for understanding and collaboration. This ethos has led the movement to advocate for peaceful coexistence, especially in conflict-prone regions where tensions between ethnic and religious groups often escalate into violence. By promoting dialogue and mutual respect, the movement seeks to create environments where diverse groups can live together peacefully.

    The movement has often been lauded in international circles for its efforts to counter extremism. Its schools and institutions serve as models of moderation, where students are encouraged to think critically and embrace values of tolerance. This stance has made the movement an influential voice in promoting a balanced interpretation of Islam that aligns with modern, democratic values.

    Overall, the Gülen movement’s contributions to education, interfaith dialogue, social service, and the promotion of peace have left a lasting impact on both Turkey and the global community. Despite facing significant political challenges and opposition, particularly in Turkey, the movement’s positive initiatives have garnered respect worldwide for their commitment to fostering understanding and bettering society through peaceful means. Fethullah Gülen’s vision of an educated, compassionate, and tolerant society continues to inspire many even after his passing.

  • Deciphering the Origin of Christopher Columbus: A 500-Year Journey

    After five centuries of speculation and theories, the true identity of Christopher Columbus has begun to emerge thanks to the documentary “Columbus DNA: his true origin ’, produced by RTVE. This feature-length film, which details 22 years of research led by forensic scientist and professor at the University of Granada, José Antonio Lorente, has revealed that the man who discovered America was, in fact, Jewish.

    The investigation began with the search for Columbus’ mortal remains, which were believed to be in Seville or the Dominican Republic. Science has confirmed that the remains in the Cathedral of Seville belong to the admiral. An analysis of the bones of his son, Hernando Colón, was crucial in establishing the parentage and resolving a 150-year dispute between Spain and the Caribbean nation. Hernando’s DNA results showed traits compatible with a Jewish origin, both in the ‘Y’ chromosome and in mitochondrial DNA.

    The documentary, presented in a true crime format, chronicles the genetic research process, where 25 possible origins of Columbus were examined and narrowed down to eight plausible hypotheses. As the theories were presented, DNA dismantled many of them, leading to the conclusion that Columbus was not Genoese, as had been believed for centuries.

    Researcher Francesc Albardaner, who led one of the lines of research, argues that Columbus was Jewish and places him in the western Mediterranean, specifically on the Iberian peninsula, where at the time of Columbus there were around 200,000 Jews. In contrast, in Italy, the Jewish population was significantly smaller. Albardaner argues that Columbus’ history as a Genoese enters into crisis if his Jewish origin is accepted, as Genoa had expelled the Jews in the 12th century.

    Research also revealed that the surname Colombo, common in Italy, was used for abandoned children, further complicating the narrative of an Italian Columbus. In addition, the Columbus letters, which are preserved in large numbers, are written in Spanish, with no Italian influence.

    The documentary also addresses other enigmas about Columbus’ life, including the revelation that his brother Diego was not really his brother, but a distant relative. Throughout his life, Columbus concealed his origin, possibly due to the persecution faced by Jews in the Iberian Peninsula. In 1492, an ultimatum was issued forcing Jews to convert to Christianity or leave the kingdoms of the Catholic Kings.

    Albardaner suggests that Columbus, throughout his life, had to appear to be a devout Christian to avoid persecution. The research also highlights the support Columbus received from Jews and converts, such as the Duke of Medinaceli and Luis de Santángel, who played a crucial role in financing his expedition to America.

    Finally, Lorente concludes that the DNA indicates a Mediterranean origin for Columbus, suggesting that his most likely provenance is in the Spanish Mediterranean arc or in the Balearic Islands, which at that time belonged to the Corona de Aragón. With this new evidence, the documentary not only rewrites the story of Columbus, but also invites a deeper reflection on the identity and legacy of the man who changed the course of history.

    References and Links:

  • Elias Castillo: A Stalwart of Latin American Legislative Leadership

    Latin America has always been known for its political landscape and intricate legal systems and few leaders represent the ideals of collaboration and legislative proficiency as well as Elias Ariel Castillo González. With more than thirty-five years dedicated to politics, Castillo is widely recognized for his commitment, honesty and strong leadership qualities. His present position, as the Executive Secretary of the Latin American Parliament (Parlatino) signifies a moment in a career shaped by a steadfast dedication to serving the public. The closest big event supported by Castillo, which will take place in September, aims to united civil society, politics, parliamentarians, academia and media, to join efforts in protecting and advancing freedom of religion or belief.

    A Storied Career

    Elias Castillo’s journey in politics began in Panama, where he quickly ascended the ranks due to his sharp intellect, strategic acumen, and deep connection with the people. His tenure in the National Assembly of Panama is particularly noteworthy, with him being elected as its president on three separate occasions. Such a record is a testament to his leadership skills and the trust he garnered from his peers.

    The prestige of his career in Panama naturally extended to the broader Latin American arena. Castillo has been a dedicated member of the Latin American and Caribbean Parliament (Parlatino) for several terms. He served as president of Parlatino three times—a rare achievement that highlights his influence and effectiveness in fostering legislative dialogue and cooperation across national borders.

    Leadership in Parlatino

    As the Executive Secretary of the Latin American Parliament, Castillo’s role is multifaceted. It involves not only steering the legislative agenda but also ensuring that the diverse interests of member states are represented and reconciled. Under his stewardship, Parlatino has undertaken significant initiatives aimed at enhancing regional integration, promoting democratic governance, and addressing pressing issues such as climate change, human rights, and economic disparity.

    Castillo’s leadership is marked by an inclusive approach. He strives to bring together legislators from different political, social, and economic backgrounds, fostering a collaborative environment where comprehensive and sustainable policies can be crafted. His vision extends beyond immediate legislative concerns to encompass long-term regional stability and prosperity.

    A Visionary for the Future

    One of Castillo’s most commendable traits is his forward-looking vision. He understands that the challenges facing Latin America—be they economic, environmental, or social—require innovative and collaborative approaches. He has been a vocal advocate for leveraging technology in governance, improving transparency, and enhancing public participation in legislative processes.

    Elias Castillo’s work also reflects a deep commitment to social justice. He has consistently championed the rights of marginalized communities, advocating for policies that promote equality and inclusivity. His efforts in this regard are not confined to rhetoric but are evident in the tangible legislative measures he supports and the initiatives Parlatino has undertaken under his guidance.

    Elias Castillo stands out as a paragon of legislative excellence in Latin America. His extensive career, marked by significant accomplishments both in Panama and on the regional stage, highlights the vital role of dedicated and visionary leadership in shaping the future of the region. As Executive Secretary of the Latin American Parliament, Castillo continues to lead with integrity, fostering a spirit of cooperation and championing the causes of democracy and development.

    In the ever-evolving political landscape of Latin America, Elias Castillo remains a steadfast figure, piecing together the diverse and intricate mosaic of regional governance with unyielding dedication and unparalleled expertise.

  • Venezuela’s Electoral Process Marred by Repression and Lack of Transparency

    The Office of the Secretary General of the Organization of American States (OAS) has received a report from the Department of Electoral Cooperation and Observation regarding the presidential electoral process in Venezuela in 2024. The report highlights the worst form of repression, where the people are prevented from finding solutions through elections.

    The Venezuelan regime has been accused of applying its repressive scheme to distort the electoral result, making it available to manipulation. The Maduro regime has mocked important actors of the international community, going into an electoral process without guarantees or mechanisms to enforce those guarantees.

    The report notes that the complete manual for fraudulent handling of the electoral result was applied in Venezuela on the night of the election, in many cases in a very rudimentary manner. There has been talk of an audit or a recount of the minutes of electoral material, but this has not had the slightest conditions of security and control.

    The opposition campaign headquarters has presented the minutes by which it would have won the election, but Maduro, including the CNE, has not yet been able to present the minutes by which it would have won. The Secretary General of the OAS, Luis Almagro, has expressed regret over the lack of cumulative memory of actors in the international community, which systematically leads to repeating errors.

    The burden of injustice on the people of Venezuela continues, with Venezuelans once again victims of repression. The Secretary General has stated that “no revolution” can leave people with fewer rights than they had, poorer in values and principles, more unequal in the instances of justice and representation, more discriminated against depending on where their thinking or political direction lies.

  • OAS Report Shakes Venezuelan Election Results: Trust in Democracy Eroded

    According to a report released by the Organization of American States (OAS) the Department of Electoral Cooperation and Observation (DECO) stated that the outcome of the Venezuelan presidential elections conducted on July 28 2024 is not acceptable. The report, directed to OAS Secretary General Luis Almagro, details irregularities and structural problems that affected the voting process casting doubt on the credibility of the elections.

    Election Results and Immediate Reactions

    The National Electoral Council (CNE) declared Nicolás Maduro as the winner of the election stating that he secured 51.2% of the votes while his main rival, Edmundo González received 44.2%. However according to the OAS report there are differences between these official figures and independent evaluations such as exit polls and citizen led verifications that showed a clear advantage for González.

    The CNEs announcement was made than six hours after the polling stations closed without providing a detailed breakdown of the results or granting access, to official tally sheets. The report criticized the CNE for labeling the results as “irreversible” despite mathematical errors and a lack of transparency.

    Systematic Intimidation and Repression

    The recent report from the Organization of American States (OAS) reveals a scheme orchestrated by the Maduro government to disrupt the electoral process by using tactics like fearmongering, political oppression and disqualifying opposition contenders. Of concern is the case of María Corina Machado, a prominent opposition leader who was barred from participating despite winning in the primary elections, a move widely perceived as politically motivated.

    Leading up to the elections there were than 135 arbitrary arrests documented in the report, with many of them targeting individuals affiliated with the opposition. The air was thick with apprehension marked by instances of violence enforced disappearances and harassment directed at supporters of opposing parties. On election day itself there were reports of intimidation incidents occurring, such as sightings of government factions, near polling places.

    Lack of Transparency and Observational Access

    The OAS report underscores the importance of transparency in elections pointing out that the CNE hindered both international observers from effectively monitoring the electoral procedures. While a few civil society organizations were granted observer status by the CNE access was denied to electoral observation missions such as the European Union and the Carter Center.

    Moreover the report highlights that the CNE refused entry to opposition witnesses at polling stations contributing to a decline in trust in the election process. Despite these obstacles local observers noted that opposition witnesses were present, in 90% of polling stations.

    Electoral Manipulation and Clientelism

    The report details how the Maduro administration used government resources to gain an edge in elections, such as offering aid in return for political backing. This tactic along with the absence of rules on campaign funding resulted in an unfair advantage for the ruling party.

    Furthermore the OAS report raised concerns about the lack of autonomy within the CNE highlighting that its members have ties, to the Maduro government. This situation undermined the credibility of the electoral commission. Cast doubts on its capacity to oversee impartial and transparent elections.

    Call for Accountability

    Based on the evidence of irregularities the OAS has determined that the official outcomes of the Venezuelan presidential elections lack credibility and should not be recognized as reflective of democratic principles. The report emphasizes the need for transparency in disclosing voting records and urges global accountability measures against the actions of the Maduro government.

    Amid protests in Venezuela following the election outcome the OAS findings underscore the ongoing struggle for democracy, within the nation. The Venezuelan populace, who displayed a dedication to exercising their democratic freedoms now confront an uncertain future as governmental authority grows stronger and dissent is suppressed.

  • Venezuela’s Presidential Election: A Path to Democracy or a Road Paved with Irregularities?

    As the dust settles from Venezuela’s recent presidential election, the European Union (EU) has provided a critical assessment of the electoral process, emphasizing the ongoing challenges faced by the nation. High Representative Josep Borrell’s recent statement sheds light on both the commendable aspects of Venezuelan civic engagement and the significant shortcomings in the electoral system. In this blog post, we will explore the implications of these recent elections for democracy in Venezuela.

    The Heart of the Matter: Voter Engagement

    The EU commends the determination of the Venezuelan people to exercise their democratic right to vote, highlighting the crucial role of civic participation in a healthy democracy. Despite severe political and economic instability, the willingness of citizens to come out and cast their ballots reflects a desire for change and a commitment to democratic principles.

    However, Borrell notes that this determination comes against a backdrop of an uneven playing field, where the opposition’s participation has been complicated by various systemic challenges. The EU recognizes the efforts of opposition groups to engage in the electoral process under these difficult circumstances, emphasizing that the will of the people must be respected and upheld.

    Lack of Transparency: A Call for Clarity

    One of the most pressing concerns outlined in the EU’s statement is the lack of transparency in the electoral results. As Borrell aptly pointed out, the reported outcomes of the elections cannot be deemed representative of the people’s will until there is a full publication and verification of all official records from polling stations.

    To instill faith in the electoral process, the EU urges the Venezuelan Electoral Council (CNE) to prioritize transparency, calling for immediate access to voting records and the publication of disaggregated election results. This call for clarity is crucial to restoring faith in the electoral system and addressing the grievances of Venezuelan citizens who feel disenfranchised.

    Flaws and Irregularities: A Troubling Trend

    Despite the commitment of Venezuelans to participate in the electoral process, credible reports indicate that the elections were rife with irregularities. The EU has expressed regret that key recommendations from the 2021 EU Electoral Observation Mission were not heeded. These recommendations aimed to address fundamental issues undermining the electoral integrity, such as obstacles to opposition candidates, deficiencies in the voter registry, and imbalanced media access.

    These flaws not only tarnish the credibility of the elections but also reinforce the perception of a political landscape heavily skewed against the opposition, raising alarms about the future of democracy in Venezuela.

    Human Rights Concerns: A Dark Cloud Over the Process

    Borrell’s statement does not shy away from addressing the concerning human rights situation in Venezuela during the electoral process. Reports of arbitrary detentions and intimidation of opposition members and civil society activists underscore a climate of fear and repression that permeates the political arena.

    The EU strongly advocates for the immediate release of all political prisoners, emphasizing that a genuine democracy can only exist with respect for human rights and freedoms. The call for calm and respect for the right to peaceful assembly is critical as tensions rise in the aftermath of the elections.

    A Hopeful Path Forward: Dialogue and Engagement

    Despite the challenges highlighted during the electoral process, the EU remains committed to supporting political and diplomatic efforts to foster dialogue and find a peaceful resolution to Venezuela’s political crisis. Borrell’s statement reiterates the EU’s support for both regional and international initiatives aimed at restoring the democratic legitimacy of Venezuelan institutions.

    In these uncertain times, a collaborative and peaceful approach remains essential in guiding Venezuela toward a more democratic and just future.

    Conclusion: Navigating the Future of Venezuelan Democracy

    Venezuela’s recent presidential election has shed light on many systemic issues that need urgent attention. While the determination of the Venezuelan populace to vote is a beacon of hope, it is overshadowed by significant electoral irregularities and human rights violations. The EU’s strong stance on transparency, respect for political rights, and the need for constructive dialogue underscores the complex challenges ahead.

    As the international community watches closely, the next steps for Venezuela will be crucial in defining its path toward democracy. Through sustained engagement and commitment to democratic principles, it is possible for Venezuela to navigate these turbulent waters and emerge as a strong, democratic nation that truly reflects the will of its people.

  • Joe Biden Exits 2024 Presidential Race, Shaking Up U.S. Political Landscape

    In a turn of events in American politics, President Joe Biden has announced that he will not seek re-election in 2024. His announcement, shared on the media this Sunday afternoon, gives Donald Trump a significant edge in the upcoming presidential race.

    Concerns about Biden’s ability to lead another campaign at the age of 81 came to a head after a televised debate with Trump on June 27 during which Biden displayed signs of cognitive fatigue. Following this, prominent Democrats, including former President Barack Obama, openly called for Biden to step aside.

    In a message posted online, Biden stated:

    “Serving as your president has been the greatest honor of my life. And while it has been my intention to run for re-election, I believe that the best course of action for my party and the country is for me to step aside and focus solely on fulfilling my duties as President for the remainder of my term.”

    Biden’s choice was also influenced by recent public blunders during events and appearances, such as at the NATO summit marking its 75th anniversary where he mistakenly referred to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy as “President Putin” and his own Vice President Kamala Harris, as “Vice President Trump.”

    The pressure reached its peak when a notable opinion piece by George Clooney, a supporter of the Democratic Party was published in the ‘New York Times’ suggesting that Biden might face challenges in his race against time.

    The situation became more complex when Biden tested positive for COVID-19, leading to his recovery at his home in Delaware. Despite plans by the Democratic Party to secure his nomination through a virtual vote before the Chicago convention, Biden eventually decided to step back.

    Biden’s withdrawal has triggered discussions about who will succeed him. Vice President Kamala Harris appears to be a contender and could potentially make history as the first female President of the United States. Nonetheless, other notable Democrats like California Governor Gavin Newsom and Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer have also emerged as candidates.

    This turn of events marks a moment in American politics as the Democratic Party faces uncertainty just months before the 2024 elections. The repercussions of this withdrawal could have far-reaching effects, on both the domestic political landscape and global power dynamics.

  • Argentina – BAYS Yoga School, Nullity of elevation to trial confirmed by the Cassation Court

    Controversial accusations of criminal activities and prosecutions rejected for the second time.

    A setback for the prosecutors

    On 5 June last, the National Chamber of Cassation for Criminal and Correctional Matters confirmed the nullity of the elevation to trial of the defendants in the case known as the “Buenos Aires Yoga School” (BAYS), accused of “criminal activities.” The decision of the Cassation Court is not the end of the case as it is returned to the judge of first instance but it is clearly a setback for the prosecutors who were twice clearly disavowed.

    In August 2022, about 50 spectacular police raids, “mysteriously” leaked to the media, were simultaneously conducted against members of the yoga school on the sole basis of unfounded accusations by one single person, Pablo Salum, that the Office of the Prosecutor for Human Trafficking and Exploitation (PROTEX) instrumentalized to support its controversial concepts of victims of trafficking and abuse of vulnerability. After that, hundreds of media outlets in Argentina and abroad had presented the yoga group headed by Juan Percowicz, now 86, as a “horror cult.”

    Salum is a bizarre and megalomaniac anti-cult individual, who sees cults everywhere, even regarding the Catholic Carmelite Order. He publicly said on social media and YouTube that he had lodged a complaint against BAYS. He also inspired PROTEX massive raids against 38 centers of the Evangelical humanitarian organization REMAR, a respected NGO specialized in the rehabilitation of drug addicts and (paradoxically) women victims of real trafficking.

    The key facts

    In September 2022, judge Ariel Lijo tried to prosecute nineteen BAYS members, including Juan Percowicz, for crimes of illegal association, human trafficking for sexual exploitation and money laundering, following a request made by federal prosecutor Carlos Stornelli and his colleagues from the PROTEX, Alejandra Mangano and Marcelo Colombo.

    From the beginning of the case, all the alleged victims denied the accusations and denounced that they were being stigmatized as “brainwashed prostitutes” when they had never prostituted themselves, and have never been forced into anything by BAYS. To dispel any doubts, they asked to be examined by forensic experts to confirm their statements.

    After that, on November 2022, the Federal Chamber of Appeal ruled the lack of merit of two defendants and, although confirming the prosecutions of the remaining, ruled that scientific psychological and psychiatric examinations be carried out on all the alleged victims in order to investigate whether there are any signs that their wills were unduly influenced or coerced.

    On 4 July 2023, without addressing the results of those examinations –which with no exception determined total lack of any characteristics of submission, emotional dependence, lability, manipulation, or the assumption of a merely passive role in the interpersonal relationships of the alleged victims– Judge Ariel Lijo and prosecutors Carlos Stornelli, Marcelo Colombo and Alejandra Mángano tried to elevate the case to trial. However, on 7 December of the same year, the National Court of Appeals for Criminal and Correctional Matters, composed of judges Martin Irurzun, Roberto Boico and Eduardo Farah, annulled that order and commanded Judge Lijo to review that forensic results and to let the defense intervene in the evaluation. This is the decision confirmed by the National Chamber of Cassation.

    The fabrication of “victims” of trafficking and the “rescue industry”

    Until 2012, trafficking in persons for sexual exploitation was punishable by Law 26.364 on Prevention and Punishment of Human Traficking and Assistance to Victims but on 19 December 2012, this law was amended in such a way that it opened the door to controversial interpretation and implementation. It is now identified as Law 26.842.

    In this context, cases of alleged human trafficking linked to spiritual minorities have emerged in Argentina along with the use of anti-cult language in the narratives of anti-trafficking agents in the media, legal and judicial settings. In this regard, decried and obsolete concepts such as “cults”, “brainwashing”, “coercive organization” and “coercive persuasion” are coming back to the front stage and are getting a new life. So, when presumed victims of trafficking deny they are victims, anti-trafficking operators now disqualify their statements because in their eyes, they do not perceive themselves as such as their adhesion to an “ideological or spiritual system” prevents them from recognizing their exploitative situation.

    This creates a “victimization paradigm” and leads to a vicious circle according to which they are vulnerable per se and, therefore, victims, who are denied the capacity and the right to intervene in the narrative of events. Their only status is “to be rescued”.

    Scholars understand this phenomenon as a “rescue industry” that allows anti-trafficking agencies to generate a large number of cases in order to increase their public visibility and authority. This also makes possible to consider a wide range of legal activities –such as volunteering and donation– as “trafficking.”

    Controversies inside and outside the courts

    Judge Lijo and PROTEX resolutions raised numerous criticisms in the Chamber of Appeal. Judge Farah has reiterated in his last vote that the alleged victims must be heard, and that not doing so means an act of paternalism alien to the due behavior of a democratic justice sensitive to gender equality. In his opinion, after listening to the personal testimonies of these women, it is clear that none of them is a victim of human trafficking, which is confirmed by the results of the forensic examinations. In Farah’s opinion, the defendants should be acquitted.

    Judges Irurzun and Boico consider that these expert opinions are essential to evaluate a change in the procedural status of the defendants. Ultimately, it was the Chamber of Appeal itself that requested their performance and now urges Judge Lijo to evaluate them. Failure to do so is contrary to the right to legitimate defense.

    But not only the court has spoken. Numerous researchers, after interviewing BAYS members and studying the legal documents, have questioned the anti-cultist arguments of PROTEX and Judge Lijo. These research results were published in scientific journals and conferences –such as the one held in Bordeaux between June 12 and 16, 2024, by the Center for the Study of New Religions (CESNUR)– as well as at the 53rd session of the United Nations Human Rights Council.

    The message is clear: denying the credibility of clinically healthy adult women through pseudoscientific arguments is a direct attack on individual liberties protected by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Argentine Constitution.

  • 4th of July Celebrations in the United States of America: Traditions, Curiosities, and Global Festivities

    The 4th of July in the United States is a time when people come together to celebrate Independence Day, which marks the adoption of the Declaration of Independence in 1776. This day is filled with festivities, cherished customs, and a strong sense of patriotism that unites Americans across the country. From small communities to busy cities, individuals honor this important holiday in various ways.

    During these celebrations, fireworks light up the evening sky, creating dazzling displays that captivate audiences. Major cities like New York City, Washington D.C., and San Francisco are renowned for their fireworks presentations that draw large crowds.

    Parades are another part of the festivities, featuring marching bands, decorated floats, and community organizations that add to the festive ambiance. Events such as the National Independence Day Parade in Washington D.C. and Macy’s 4th of July Parade in New York City are widely recognized and receive national attention.

    Gatherings for barbecues and picnics are also common on the 4th of July, allowing people to enjoy food and socialize with loved ones amidst a backdrop of celebration.

    During the 4th of July, families and friends come together in spaces like backyards, parks, and beaches to savor classic American dishes such as grilled hot dogs and hamburgers. The aroma of barbecue mingles with the sounds of laughter and merriment, emphasizing the communal spirit of the holiday.

    The air resonates with melodies featuring tunes like “The Star-Spangled Banner,” “America the Beautiful,” and “God Bless America” that echo through public areas and private gatherings alike.

    Interesting Aspects of Independence Day

    “Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest”: An annual event at Coney Island in New York where participants from across the globe compete to consume the most hot dogs within a 10-minute time frame. The contest attracts viewers both in person and through televised broadcasts.

    Regional Traditions: In Florida, one can witness boat parades, while rodeos are a way to celebrate in Texas. These localized customs bring a unique touch to the nationwide celebrations.

    Reenactments of Historical Events: Some regions, especially in the original thirteen colonies, host reenactments of battles from the Revolutionary War and readings of the Declaration of Independence. These events offer a glimpse into history and foster a deeper connection to the country’s roots.

    It’s a moment for people in the United States to ponder their freedoms, honor their culture, and anticipate what lies ahead. Across the country, in bustling centers and quaint rural areas alike, Independence Day is a lively showcase of American heritage brimming with customs and peculiarities that grow and change with each passing year.

    As this pivotal day progresses, it serves as a symbol of the timeless principles of freedom and togetherness that underpin the foundation of the nation.